KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Difference between Trademark Infringement & Piracy. Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


wordpress-hosting

Offsite Links


It is currently Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:09 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:51 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:45 am
Posts: 172
Location: Cleveland, Ohio (US)
Been Liked: 37 times
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Because I am simply going off how I interpreted everything.

Trademark infringement is proving that someone copied your product that has
your trademarked name on it. Then passing it off as if it is the original when all
the while they are pirating it. Even if the manufacturer loses the case due to
not being able to prove that they also attempted to trick people into thinking it
was the original tracks/trademark. It does not mean that it was not pirated. Just
that a manufacturers only legal standing is their trademark. The FBI, music
producers would have to take that same PIRATE to court.

Case in point. A retailer was sued by Sleptone for loading hard drives with
karaoke music having SOUNDCHOICE trademark on it. That case was lost
by Sleptone only because they could not meet all the elements that would
require a conviction. More of a technicality/loop hole when the defendant clearly
was copying their product.

During testimony the defendants own witneses who clearly were not in the loop about trying to lie simply told the same thing that the sellers employees stated. That the computers were sold with tons of music on it, with soundchoice too, NO DISC came with it. The defendent then tried to say that they told the customers that they had to have
their own disc, that it was just basically a service (I did not read that transcript part, was told by someone at the trial). That sounds like the typical BS that is being pulled by
all these pirates! So between the employees verifying that NO ONE was told they had to have their own disc and the defendants own customer witnesses that accidentally backfired on them. It was clear they were selling loaded computers with a copy of the music with no original disc, no license. just copying it in their dungen so to speak. I wanted to explain this distinction because new consumers get confused and think that defendants like this simply were not pirating because the plantif could not reach the level needed to convict just upon one simple technicality/loop hole.

_________________
MADPROAUDIO ~ DISABLED VETERAN ~ FAMILY OWNED COMPANY


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech