KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Sound Choice Website updated Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


Offsite Links

It is currently Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:50 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:20 pm 
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4832
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 580 times
I don't know about you, but my CRAP-O-METER alarm went off like an old time "ahhoogah horn."
JimHarrington wrote:
Because we have no control over the length of time that the license is in force, the proper term for the arrangement is a possessory license--the right to keep and use the property.

PEP can revoke their "license" whenever they want for a number of different reasons.
Here's an example of how they can do this:
Their contract says that they can revoke their license if the licensee does anything "illegal." Well guess what? Their license also indemnifies PEP for any legal action against a licensee by a "third party rights holder" (like a publisher) if they didn't get "all the permissions needed to perform in a commercial environment."

Remember Harrington saying more than once; "Our permission is sufficient, but it may not be enough" because a KJ could still be sued by a publisher or writer etc...

And their contract specifically indemnifies them in the specific case of "infringement." Which even PEP will tell you is a "no-no."

Now, connect the dots: Guess what? In order for a Gem "licensee" or H.E.L.P. licensee to get any value from the license they sign (i.e. the "covenant not to sue") requires that they commit copyright infringement in the process of exercising their "rights" under the contract.

Committing copyright infringement is a violation of the copyright laws - and that's not legal... Just ask Harrington.
So they can yank their "license/lease" whenever they want. Why do you think they settled with EMI if what they were doing was perfectly legal?

Read the contract yourself.

#1. A "lease" requires "property" (like land, or a car etc. )
#2. A "license" does not require property. (Like a "license to display a trademark")

Under the law, a license agreement that smells, feels, or tastes like a lease will be construed as a lease no matter what it is titled. Conversely, a document titled “lease agreement” but containing all the characteristics and attributes of a license agreement will be construed as a license.

 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 25, 2017 4:31 am 
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 4865
Been Liked: 532 times
8) This is where it gets confusing GEM is a hard product like land or a car, so wouldn't that make it a lease rather than just a mere license? Although PEP can demand the return of the GEM product at any time.

 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 8 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 155 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech